Differences between management and leadership
“Management and leadership”, usually these words are generally heard together. Are they interconnected? Are there differences between them? It’s a discussion that has been going on for some time and will be around for some time to come. This is a common subject for discussion in various management training programs and management training courses. The fact is that you can not escape on this subject if you participate in any type of management training program.
A leader is a person who runs that a manager is the one who manages. It’s not funny, but we need to start somewhere and what better than the basic definitions. The biggest difference that perceived by others is the way they motivate people. In life, nothing is black or white, everything is a nuance of different gray. Similarly, a manager can be a leader and vice versa. So we can have a combination of both.
Management training manuals will indicate that managers have subordinates. Managers receive powers from society and subordinates must do as they are told. The incentive to a subordinate to do what the manager says is the given reward. So, if the subordinate does it as he / she is said, they will have their salary. These are not blind robots but the incentive makes them behave like that. On the other hand, leaders have followers. And after a voluntary activity is a voluntary activity. The leaders do not tell people what needs to be done instead, they show them the way by taking an initiative and doing things first. The leaders show them that if they follow the leader, they will fulfill the desire of their hearts.
What is the chief focus for a manager? Management training programs and management training courses will indicate that the main objective of a manager should be a manager. They are paid to get things done. After all, they are themselves subordinated to another manager. They often have delays that stand in advance so that they can not afford to focus on anything else. Officers on the other hand focus on people. They have a way with people; They give credit to others and blame themselves. This creates a faithful base of subscribers around them. It does not mean they are very friendly with their disciples. On the contrary most of them maintain some kinds of distances to maintain their mystical.
Managers seem to look for lives at ease. These are planners and avoid taking risks. They avoid situations that will lead to conflicts and prefer to have cordial relationships with others. Leaders on the other hand seem to look for risks. It’s not that they are looking for strong sensations. It is only the leaders have a vision and are willing to face any problems they encounter in order to make this vision a reality.
There is a difference in the perspective of both. While managers think incrementally thinks, leaders think radically. You have all heard about the phrase “Managers do things right while the leaders do the right thing.” Thus, while managers tend to think by the book, leaders tend to go more by their intuition. A manager is pragmatic while a chef is more emotional. That’s why we tend to follow the leaders because they lead us to an emotional level. Management is generally composed of experienced people in their field. These are people who know how the entire system works. A leader on the other hand can be a new employee with new ideas and a new vision, but without the experience and wisdom needed to make it work.